Your words
Corella speaks your organisation's language, not ours.
Every sector has its own word, and in each one it is the word. A community nursing service says patient. An NDIS provider says participant, because that is the word in the Act. Supported accommodation says resident, aged care says care recipient, and a peer-support service says consumer on purpose. There is no correct default — which is exactly what a setting is for. So in Corella it is one, and the interface follows whatever you choose.
How it flows
The word travels everywhere you read it — and deliberately nowhere that a link, a statute or a stored record depends on it.
One picker, and the whole interface changes its mind
Settings → Roster display → “What you call the people you support”. Eight ready-made choices — client, patient, participant, resident, care recipient, consumer, customer, member — plus the option to type your own. Save, and the word changes in the sidebar, the page headings, the table column headers, the filters, the empty states, the pickers, the dialogs, the confirmation messages, the report titles, and the headers of every CSV you export. It is one setting for the organisation, not a per-person preference.

All four word forms are stored, never guessed
Singular, plural, title case and title-case plural are kept as four separate values, because deriving them breaks in ways you would notice every day. Adding an s turns person into persons, so an organisation that wanted to say person and people would have been stuck with the wrong plural. Capitalising the first letter renders care recipient as Care recipient on one screen and invites Care Recipient on the next. Corella asks for all four and then uses the right one in the right place — the patient's plan mid-sentence, Patients on a nav item.
Nothing in the address bar moves
This is the first thing a switching provider asks, and the answer is that web addresses never follow the setting. /clients stays /clients whatever you call the people listed there. Bookmarks your team has kept for months keep working, links inside emails already sent keep working, and the magic links that get a family into the portal keep working. The word is a label on the screen, not a route — which is precisely why changing it is safe.
Documents a scheme requires keep the scheme's own words
Some words are not yours to choose, and software that pretended otherwise would be doing you a disservice. An NDIS service agreement says participant because that is the word in the Act. An NDIA payment request says Participant because the scheme's own file says so. A Support at Home statement says care recipient. Those documents carry the scheme's vocabulary no matter what you have set, and that is correct behaviour rather than a limitation. The honest way to put it, and the way the product puts it: the interface follows your words; documents a scheme requires keep the scheme's.
A display setting, not a migration
Choosing a different word does not touch a single record. The underlying data, the relationships and the history all stay exactly as they were, so there is no migration to schedule, no downtime to plan and no risk to weigh — you can try patient on a Tuesday and go back to client on a Thursday. Documents you have already generated keep the wording they were issued with, because an invoice or an agreement is a record of what was sent; re-rendering history in new vocabulary would be the wrong thing to do, so Corella leaves it alone.
And the word for your own people
The people you support are only half of it. The generic word for the people who deliver the work is its own setting too — carer, support worker, nurse, clinician, care worker or staff member — so a nursing service's screens read visible to nurses rather than visible to carers. The two settings pair up the way real organisations do: a wound service says patient and nurse, an aged-care provider says care recipient and care worker, and a supported-accommodation house says resident and support worker. Being straight about the boundary: this is four settings — the people you support, your role names, the episode of care, and the people who deliver it — not a rename of every noun in the product. And where a form asks about a family carer, that word deliberately stays carer, because there it means the person's own family rather than your staff.
The same choice for an episode of care
The word for a funded piece of work is its own setting, built the same way: case, episode of care, referral, claim, or something you type. A clinic that thinks in referrals and a nursing service that thinks in episodes both get to say so, and the same three rules hold — interface only, addresses unchanged, history intact.
Fair questions
Asked about this, often.
So Corella isn't only for NDIS providers?
What if our word isn't one of the eight?
Can different teams inside one organisation use different words?
Will an NDIS service agreement say our word instead of participant?
Is there any risk in changing it later?
Does it change what our staff see on their phones?
See your organisation in Corella.
A 30-minute walkthrough with the people who built it — your workflows, your terminology, not a canned demo.